Atlantans for Progressive Libraries.com
Home Table of Contents Archives Frequently Asked Questions Contact Us

Fulton County Taxpayer Dollars Wasted in 2007

  • County Sheriff Sued for Ignoring (Another) Court Decision
    Posted October 23, 2007

    The editor of Prison Legal News filed suit this week to force Fulton County sheriff Myron Freeman to allow prisoners in the county jail to subscribe to his prisoners' rights magazine. A federal judge had ruled in 2002 that a similar ban by Freeman's predecessor was unconstitutional. Details from Monday's Atlanta Journal-Constitution.

    And how much, one wonders, will defending (and then losing or settling) this additional - and completely avoidable - federal lawsuit cost Fulton County taxpayers?

  • Cost to Taxpayers of Defending Nichols Approaching $2 Million
    Posted October 11, 2007

    It looks like county taxpayers not only will be paying for the county to prosecute the guy, but for defending him in court as well. Details from an Atlanta-Journal Constitution story.

    That fatal bit of incompetent county security a few years back is certainly going to cost taxpayers a heap o' money. Reminds us of that old bumper sticker that reads "Think education is expensive? Consider the alternative." Ditto for "competent county security employees."

  • Elections Officials Pondering How Much to Fine Fulton County
    for Inadvertently Destroying 93,000 Voter Registrations
       Posted September 26, 2007

    Whatever the amount of the fine, it's going to be a whopper. Details from a story in today's Atlanta Journal-Constitution.

    And we wonder why some people applying for library cards frown at us when we tell them their libraries are operated by Fulton County government. Well, it's good to know that fines for overdue library materials can help pay off those fines (and lawsuit judgments and settlements) the county is forced to pay for breaking the law. Unfortunately for county taxpayers, the price of incompetence is often a steep one.

  • County Spends Thousands Re-Hiring Highly-Paid Retired Employees
    Posted August 16, 2007; additional link inserted August 19, 2007

    AFPL employees have long marveled at the fact that they occasionally receive emails mentioning the officially-retired-but-still-on-the-payroll-as-a-"consultant" Bob Brandes, former head of the county's personnel department.

    Now we learn this double-dipping phenom (getting a pension plus a salary or "consultant's fee") isn't all that rare in Fulton County government.

    The Atlanta Journal-Constitution has details, not on Brandes' nice little gig (which it doesn't mention), but on the county largess enjoyed by another high-level county administator.

    What's especially galling - at least for those of us still toiling away at low-level county jobs - is that these consultant fees for handsomely-paid rehires of retirees are funded by administrators freezing vacant positions created for the day-to-day delivery of county services. Every vacant position, at any level, means that some county employee somewhere is doing two or more county jobs, and getting paid for only one of them.

    August 19th Update: The AJC published this editorial on August 17th about this particular method being used by Fulton County officials to squander taxpayer dollars. Our sentiments exactly.

  • Discrepancies of Hundreds of Thousands of Dollars
    Discovered in Records Kept by County Jail Employees
       Posted August 16, 2007

    More proof that, at the very least, the county continues to hire employees whose math skills clearly aren't adequate for conducting the county government's day-to-day business. Details from yesterday's front page of the Atlanta Journal-Constitution.

  • County's Former Chief Jailer Sentenced for Accepting Bribe   Posted August 9, 2007

    Details from the Atlanta Journal-Constitution.

  • More Lawsuit-Potential Problems Uncovered at County's Jail
    Posted June 28, 2007; updated June 29, July 15, July 16, July 19, July 27, and August 8, 2007

    Details from the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, with an AJC update here.

    July 15, 2007 Update: Predictably, the sheriff's lawyers, instead of acknowledging the possible link between an understaffed and/or untrained jail staff and excessive TASER use on jail inmates, is denying that the federal judge has any business demanding an accounting of recent TASER use incidents at the county jail.

    Yet another lawyer-generated smokescreen, paid for by county taxpayers.

    Details from the Atlanta Journal-Constitution.

    July 16, 2007 Update: Another AJC story on questionable TASER use at the jail by jail staff.

    July 19, 2007 Update: The judge's answer to the county sheriff's objection to being asked about TASER use at the jail is described here.

    July 27, 2007 Update: The county sheriff has fired one of the jail's deputies for misusing her TASER, then lying about it to investigators. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution story notes that the firing happened only after a federal judge insisted on an explanation of the incident (among others reported to the judge).

    So much for effective "internal" controls over jail personnel in Fulton County - not to mention effective training and trustworthiness of at least some of the county government's (armed) jail employees.

    August 8, 2007 Update: Another jail deputy accused of misusing her TASER resigned August 1st.

  • County Inspector Accused (Again) of Demanding Bribes
    Posted June 18, 2007; updated July 5, 2007 and July 10, 2007

    Details from the Atlanta Journal-Constitution.

    July 5th Update: The county inspector arrested in this case later claimed that accepting gifts from companies the county government regulates is common practice, despite the county's rules forbidding it. Details.

    July 10th Update: The arrested inspector pleaded guilty at his court appearance on the bribery charge. Details.

  • County Jail Clerk's 'Oversight' Could Cost Taxpayers in Lawsuit Settlement
    Posted June 29, 2007

    Willie Lovett & Co. are at it again, generating a legalistic smokescreen in an attempt to cover up obvious county employee incompetence - a futile maneuver that will only result in a more expensive settlement later on, like it did with the library discrimination lawsuit.

  • County DFACS Official Indicted for Child Abuse   Posted June 25, 2007

    More publicity about the caliber of employees on Fulton County's payroll.

  • Plea Bargain in $2 Million Scam of Sheriff's Office Funds   Posted June 12, 2007

    Details from the Atlanta Journal-Constitution.

  • Aide to Former County Sheriff Took Bribe   Posted May 15, 2007

    Details from today's Atlanta Journal-Constitution.

  • The Dollar Cost of Incompetent Security Guards   Posted March 23, 2007

    The lax behavior of certain security guards at the Fulton County courthouse that allowed Brian Nichols to escape from custody and kill four people is resulting in the most expensive trial in Georgia's history. Everyone's read about the exhorbitant cost of Nichols' defense, but the cost of prosecuting Nichols is expected to cost taxpayers twice that much. Details.

  • County Jail Food Service Contract Awarded to Highest Bidder
    Posted February 22, 2007; updated July 19, 2007

    Details from today's Atlanta Journal-Constitution. The extra cost to the taxpayers that would have resulted from the original contract award: $850,000. (That figure doesn't include the costs of re-bidding the contract, now that the hanky-panky has come to light).

    We note that it was an unsuccessful bidder's complaint - not questions from the commissioners - that has spurred the so-called investigation into the questionable contract award. So much for the county commissioners' diligence in overseeing the awarding of lucrative county contracts.

    Also unsurprising is the claim by county employees that they were told to doctor the bid evaluation documents. There are plenty of library employees who can remember feeling pressured (back in the Hooker/McClure era) to distort their evaluations of library materials vendors bids to suit the preferences of a certain former board member.

    We have to wonder about the chances of any "investigation" by the county attorney turning up any wrongdoing by her employer. After all, this is the same attorney who steadfastly denied in multiple court hearings that there was any race discrimination going on in the county's library system.

    Meanwhile, distortions of fact continue to emanate from the county jail about the staffing situation there, a problem that's repeatly surfaced in the course of yet another (expensive) federal court case involving Fulton County government.


    July 19, 2007 Update: Half of Fulton's commissioners want to renew the current contract, the other half want to give it to another vendor. That leaves the contract in limbo, and the status quo intact. Details from the Atlanta Journal Constitution.





Home Table of Contents Archives Frequently Asked Questions Contact Us