Mary Kaye Hooker's Library
...By the Numbers
Posted March 31, 2004; revised May 12, 2004
| No. of Deputy Directors serving the library system |
0 |
| No. of Technology Managers |
0 |
| No. of Technical Services Managers |
0 |
| No. of Computer Hardware Managers |
0 |
| No. of Collection Development Managers |
0 |
| No. of Systemwide Training Coordinators |
0 |
| No. of Public Information Officers |
0 |
| No. of Development Officers |
0 |
| No. of Building/Maintenance Managers |
0 |
| No. of Acquisitions Librarians |
0 |
| No. of Serials Librarians |
0 |
| No. of Catalog Editors |
0 |
| No. of Head Catalogers |
0 |
| No. of Bug-Free Automation Systems |
0 |
| No. of Circulation Managers |
0 |
| No. of Contract Compliance Officers |
0 |
| No. of Electronic Resources Managers |
0 |
| No. of full-time purchasing coordinators for bestsellers |
0 |
| No. of Reference Services Advisory Committees |
0 |
| No. of Circulation Advisory Committees |
0 |
| No. of AFPL facilities without managers due to hiring freeze on vacated positions |
4 |
| No. of frozen staff positions thawed by County Manager at Hooker's request |
0 |
No. of library sites now processing library materials
since Hooker dismantled the library system's centralized Technical Services Division |
32 |
No. of Information Technology departments
county officials have removed from Mary Kaye Hooker's supervision |
1 |
| No. of library print shops dismantled by Mary Kaye Hooker |
1 |
Amount from library materials budget, in thousands of dollars, transferred from
Collection Development Unit to Central Library's Library Express department
to purchase bestsellers for entire library system |
60 |
No. of weeks in past 52 weeks AFPL owned at least one copy
of every New York Times bestseller |
4 |
Longest potential wait, in years, recorded in past year for a library user
wanting to read a NYT bestseller owned by the library system |
7.5 |
| No. of bookmobiles owned by library system |
2 |
| No. of bookmobiles currently in operation |
0 |
| No. of branch libraries accounting for over half of AFPL's total circulation |
4 |
| Percentage of AFPL's total materials funds allocated to those 4 branches |
25 |
| Percentage reduction in Central Library's materials budget from 1991 to 2001 |
50 |
Cost, in thousands of taxpayer dollars, of outside consultant's
recent investigation of alleged EEO violations by library administrators |
112 |
| Price per page of the consultant's report, in thousands of taxpayer dollars |
3 |
| Percentage of library staff reporting "below-average morale" to board's consultant |
54 |
| Percentage reporting "very high morale" |
3 |
No. of incontrovertibly documented illegal personnel transactions
bearing Hooker's and former Deputy Director Carolyn Garnes' signatures
that were initiated after the successful discrimination lawsuit against the library |
2 |
No. of those illegal personnel transactions
that the board's consultant described in her report |
0 |
| No. of sentences consultant devoted in her report to the role of former Deputy Director
Carolyn Garnes in authorizing illegal personnel transactions |
0 |
Percentage of the consultant's two dozen recommendations
that focus on better record-keeping (!) |
40 |
No. of consultant's recommendations calling for termination of administrators
who have authorized illegal personnel transactions |
0 |
Amount, in millions of taxpayer dollars, of damages
a federal jury awarded to plaintiffs in library lawsuit |
23.4 |
Amount, in millions of dollars, of damages trial judge approved for plaintiffs
several months later |
16.8 |
Amount, in thousands of taxpayer dollars, the county government reportedly paid
to hire an outside law firm to unsuccessfully appeal the verdict |
300 |
Approximate amount, in thousands of taxpayer dollars per day, of interest accruing
on the plaintiffs' damage award during the many months that elapsed
while the county government appealed the trial verdict |
1 |
Amount, in millions of taxpayer dollars, finally awarded to plaintiffs
when county and plaintiffs settled the lawsuit almost four years after it was filed |
18 |
Amount, in thousands of additional taxpayer dollars, later awarded to two plaintiffs
to settle another lawsuit against Hooker and others for retaliating against them |
250 |
Cost, in thousands of taxpayer dollars, of a never-implemented redesign
of the library's web site by a consultant hired by Hooker |
35 |
Amount, in thousands of taxpayer dollars, wasted on bracing shelves at the
Central Library after an inadequate number of shelvers assigned to the floor
where those shelves were located resulted in a single set of shelves collapsing |
185 |
| No. of books that amount of money would have purchased
for county libraries |
9,250 |
No. of months the public's access to the Central Library's collections was denied
while outside contractors braced the shelves on several floors at Central |
3 |
| Amount, in thousands of taxpayer dollars, diverted by Hooker this year
to an outside vendor to process library materials--work previously performed by library staff members |
175 |
Approximate original cost, in thousands of taxpayer dollars,
of Central Library Plaza renovations undertaken by Hooker |
186 |
Revised cost, in thousands of taxpayer dollars, of Plaza renovations
(approved August 21, 2002) |
280 |
Revised revised cost, in thousands of taxpayer dollars, of Plaza renovations
(approved May 21, 2003) |
330 |
| No. of years a gigantic crater in the Plaza has remained in front of the Central Library,
despite these ever-increasing expenditures |
2 |
Approximate amount, in thousands of dollars, Hooker and the library board
removed from this year's book budget due to county budget cuts |
300 |
No. of library managers murdered in their offices by library employees
in the first hundred years of the library system's existence |
0 |
No. of library managers murdered in their offices by library employees
during Hooker's tenure |
1 |
No. of years the strained relations between that manager and her killer
had been documented without library administrators taking steps to separate them |
5 |
No. of formal reprimands given by the manager to her murderer
in the two years before the killing |
4 |
| No. of formal reprimands required to terminate a Fulton County employee |
2 |
No. of times the murder victim had asked police to sit in on disciplinary meetings
with the employee who later killed her |
3 |
| No. of times manager's murderer shot her before killing himself |
6 |
| No. of library administrators Hooker demoted as a result of the murder/suicide |
1 |
No. of library directors who resigned or were terminated
as a result of the murder/suicide |
0 |
| No. of librarians at the El Paso Public Library (where Hooker was director before being
hired at AFPL) who, according to a newspaper story, left their jobs between 1994 and
1999 rather than continue working with Hooker |
6 |
No. of AFPL employees, from the Central Library alone, who have left their jobs
or who Hooker involuntarily transferred out of Central between 1999 and 2004 |
48 |
| Percentage of AFPL library facilities losing, rather than gaining, circulation last year |
50 |
| Estimated number of catalog records, in thousands, that, when the library brought up its
new automation system in mid-April, that vanished from the catalog due to an insufficient
number of technical services staff to create accurate permanent catalog records before the migration
to the new system |
58 |
| No. of catalogers on library staff available to reinstate those deleted records |
1 |
Amount, in thousands of taxpayer dollars, spent by library trustees for recruiting
firm to identify Mary Kaye Hooker as a candidate for library director position at AFPL |
35 |
| Hooker's annual salary (not including benefits), in thousands of taxpayer dollars |
117 |
Got some verifiable numbers of your own to share?
Contact AFPLWATCH and we'll gladly add yours to the chart...
Dept. of Useful Remedies 
Posted March 31, 2004
"Library Board Members Overdue for Pokey"
An alert AFPLWATCH reader called our attention to a letter to
the editor of the Atlanta Journal-Constitution that we had overlooked.
The letter appeared in last Sunday's edition.
After reading of the latest ugly chapter in the Fulton County Library
suit, I think we shouldn't have to wait for a jackpot-hunting trial
lawyer to get justice (
"Race divided Fulton libraries," Metro, March 21). The problem with
that plan is that the taxpayers who are also victims of the injustice
have to do all the paying and the actual culprits get off free.
We need an energetic prosecutor who could find a way to prosecute the
library board members who caused the mess. The fact that they have
been sued again and lost again makes it clear they aren't learning
from their experience. A little time in the Fulton County Jail instead
of the library would provide the cure. As a Fulton County taxpayer, I
want to see these people stopped before they cost us more money.
R. LAMAR SMITH, Atlanta
AFPLWATCH Comment:
In the spirit of equal treatment, we propose that the cell selected to
house the board members be large enough to accommodate the
equally-guilty library director.
Suggestions for the Mary Kaye Makeover Project
Posted March 27, 2004
As predicted, the library's
trustees--well, the ones who haven't resigned recently--haven't
explained to library staff when Hooker will begin undergoing her
board-mandated sensitivity training, or how they plan to evaluate the
training's effectiveness.
The ever-helpful AFPLWATCH thus offers the following questions for a
proposed rating sheet that trustees could use to calibrate the
fascinating emergence of the kinder, gentler, more sensitive Mary Kaye.
(And of course we caution the trustees not to let Hooker's
recently-filed discrimination complaint against them cloud their
judgment as they begin collecting their data.)
- Has Hooker reduced the frequency of abusive verbal assaults on
employees and stopped making critical remarks about employees behind
their backs?
- Does Hooker seem more reflective and less prone to knee-jerk
reactions, personal put-downs, and impulsive decrees?
- Has Hooker begun seeking the advice of knowledgeable colleages
before reaching decisions, or cut down on the number of discussion-stopping
pronouncements on major issues facing the library?
- Has Hooker stopped taking credit for other people's accomplishments?
Has she stopped routinely disparaging the abilities of her predecessors?
- Is Hooker making fewer grandiose claims for how rapidly the library
is improving or expanding its services? Has she stopped slapping new
names on longstanding library programs, collections, departments, or
services?
- Has Hooker stopped barging into other people’s meetings uninvited?
Does she make fewer irrelevant remarks at the meetings she insists on
barging into? Is she still abruptly leaving meetings she's barged into
before those meetings have been adjourned?
- Has Hooker stopped dragooning AFPL employees into attending
meetings with her where she’s supposed to represent the library?
- Does Hooker show more respect these days for library employees' work
schedules and workloads or is she still blithely assigning them to show
up at meetings or events for the sole purpose of allaying Hooker's
anxieties about information about the library she might be asked at
those meetings or functions to provide?
- Are Hooker’s attempts at humor still confined to dismissive sarcasm?
Has she at least stopped mocking employees who ask her questions in
public?
- Has Hooker gone a full month without publicly blaming “The Staff”
for “dropping the ball”?
- Has Hooker stopped flirting with library vendors?
- Has Hooker--who's been employed at AFPL now since September
1999--gotten any better at remembering library employees’ names, most
of whom have been working at AFPL decades longer than she has?
- Does Hooker still annoy Central Library employees in the staff
lounge, interrupting their break periods and lunch hours by trying to
wheedle information and gossip out of them?
- Has Hooker slowed the torrent of confusing and/or insulting euphemisms
and evasions she uses to deflect attention away from her obvious lack
of skills and even more obvious failures in leadership?
- Has Hooker acknowledged an inkling of responsibility for any recent
miscalculation, misjudgment, blunder, error, or failure?
We feel sure there are additional probing questions that AFPL's trustees
could use to construct some sort of Sensitivity Index for library
directors. We invite our readers to submit
their own suggestions to be posted along with the ones listed above.
Since the trustees spent $112,000 to obtain a consultant's
recommendation that Hooker urgently needed sensitivity training (and--
despite her $100,000 a year paycheck--additional management training),
we certainly look forward to the board's official report on how
well their "solution" to the problem has worked out. And we hope the
trustees won't wait too long to enlighten us. After all, the trustees
interact with the "insensitive" Hooker only once or twice a month--the
rest of us are coping with her abrasive nincompoopery for a minimum of
40 hours a week.
Hooker to EEOC: There's A Conspiracy to Get Rid of Me
Posted March 24, 2004; corrections posted March 25, 2004; link added March 30, 2004
[The headline above and the text below has been corrected to reflect
the fact (as stated in the Atlanta Journal-Constitution's story)
that Hooker filed her complaint with the federal Equal Employment Opportunity
Commission (EEOC), rather than the county's Office of Equal Employment
Opportunity (OEEO). In our haste to call attention to this remarkable
development in the never-ending saga of Mary Kaye Hooker, AFPLWATCH got
its acronyms mixed up.
The county created its OEEO to investigate EEO-related allegations and,
whenever possible, to propose administrative resolutions to compelling
complaints that otherwise might morph into expensive lawsuits. Hooker
chose to circumvent the county government and instead lodge her complaint
directly with the federal government.
We doubt that Hooker flipped a coin to help her decide which agency's
protection she hopes to obtain. We suspect Hooker--realizing her
complaint might get a rather chilly reception from investigators
who've examined so many EEO complaints naming Hooker as the
perpetrator (rather than the victim) of discrimination--chose the EEOC
precisely because she imagines she'll get a more sympathetic ear
there, or that she could buy herself more time on the county
payroll this way. We shall see. Meanwhile, as Hooker bides her time
in her bunker waiting for the EEOC's ruling on her complaint, the
library continues its steady, sickening descent into the abysmal
depths of mediocrity and dysfunction.]
An article in today's Atlanta Journal-Constitution reports that
library director Mary Kaye Hooker filed a complaint last month
with the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission against the
library's Board of Trustees.
Read the AJC article.
Link added March 30, 2004:
Read the story as reported March 30th by Library Journal.
AFPLWATCH Comment:
Well, well, well. Hooker tried this same gambit back in El Paso when
she got herself into deep doo-doo there. (At this rate, sometime soon
Hooker will be discovered at the bottom of a convenient stairway, not
a hair askew, claiming that Someone Out to Get Her pushed her down
those stairs.)
Dozens of AFPL employees know from painful personal experience that
this woman has no scruples when it comes to denying responsibility for
her own misdeeds and hanging onto that big paycheck of hers, but
Hooker's eleventh-hour filing of a frivolous EEO complaint takes the
proverbial cake.
Inquiring Minds long to know what protected class Hooker's claiming to
be a member of--last we checked, "Probable Sociopaths" wasn't among
them. We long to read the full, preposterous text of Hooker's complaint.
And we can't wait to read the EEOC's ruling after it investiges the facts.
The fact that Hooker filed her EEOC claim just before the board "acted"
on the Hooker-disparaging audit the board paid a consultant $112,000 to
conduct explains a lot--for example, board chair Annette Steed's sudden
resignation. What remains mysterious is how Hooker could testify
during the federal discrimination trial that race played no role in
the board's deliberations, then turn around and complain to the EEOC
that the board is behaving in a racially discriminatory manner towards
her. Did Hooker commit perjury at the trial, or is she merely
making false accusations now?
As with everything else Hooker does, she's only trying to wring a few
more paychecks out of the county's coffers before the inevitable
farewell party. Hooker can file all the complaints she wants, but if
the legislature changes who she reports to--and it looks like it will
do just that within the final few days of this year's legislative
session (see story below)--we predict that Hooker will soon be
passing into the colorful and appallingly destructive history of
Fulton County government.
Meanwhile, tonight's board of trustees meeting should be interesting.
More trustee resignations, anyone? This time in sheer disgust rather
than in fear of a potential lawsuit?
And speaking of lawsuits, wouldn't be edifying for the county's taxpayers
to see Fulton County dragged into yet another lawsuit by that lawsuit-generator
par excellence Mary Kaye Hooker? Maybe then the county's taxpayers
would finally be moved to react rather forcefully toward those in county government
who've allowed Hooker and the board to destroy the county's library system.
Comments from AFPLWATCH Readers:
Posted March 26, 2004
Doesn't Fulton County require Managers (of which Hooker is lamentably
one) to promptly report any instances of EEO violations? If they don't,
are they not subject to disciplinary procedures? Or perhaps, one
wonders, to additional training?
One also wonders what attorney would be willing to take on this hot
potato? Will Balch and Bingham do it? Perhaps Griffin Bell at King &
Spalding? Or will Hooker work from the Yellow Pages, Googling to find
an attorney of note who doesn't mind a little perjury in the background?
--"Once Bitten, Twice Shy"
Posted March 25, 2004
I am so glad that Hooker has finally and publicly bit the
collective hands that have been feeding her for years.
According to the article it seems that our own Mary Kaye jumped the
gun. She filed this complaint assuming that she would be terminated.
Now it has backfired on her. The board showed support for her at a
time when her termination would have been justified. Now she has placed
a magnifying glass on the board's inability to make good decisions.
Bad board, Bad board, what you gonna do? What you gonna do when the
director you sic on us, starts attacking you?
--"SicknTired"
Send your own comments about this story to be posted (with or without
your name) at AFPLWATCH.
Vote Approaches on Library Reform Bill
Posted March 24, 2004
Georgia Senator Tom Price confirmed yesterday that Senate Bill 231
has been reported out of its House committee and will be voted on by
the entire House before this year's legislative session ends several days
from today. Delegates to the legislature from Fulton County have
unanimously approved a vote on the bill, so passage seems highly
probable.
Price's bill would abolish AFPL's current board of trustees, create a smaller
board, and remove the board's authority for hiring and firing the library director
from the new board.
Library employees and library users who want this bill passed should
immediately contact their own representatives to the Georgia House of
Representatives and urge them to vote for the bill.
"Race Divided Fulton Libraries;
Years after Suits, Morale Still Low"
Posted March 22, 2004
Read the
article published in the Sunday, March 21st issue of the
Atlanta Journal-Constitution.
Here's the text of a sidebar included in the text of the printed
edition of the AJC story but omitted from the online version:
About the Library System
The 32-branch library system was created largely from the 1983 merger
of the Atlanta and Fulton County systems.
The system now has a circulation of about 3 million annually and a
similar number of visits. The system claims 301,980 registered users.
It is semi-independent from county government--employees are county
staff, but they report to the director and the library trustees, not
the county manager and board of commissioners. The system has a $30
million annual budget and about 400 positions.
The system doesn't fare well in national rankings. The annual Hennen's
American Public Library Ratings use such factors as staff, circulation,
budget and material resources to grade systems across the country.
Atlanta's score of 413 came in at less than half of the top-performing
systems. Denver, which boasts the top-ranked system, scored a 909.
Georgia ranks 45th nationally for the quality of its libraries.
Atlanta's score comes in slightly higher than the state average of 374.
Washington, D.C. ranked last with a 291.
The March Agency Meeting
Report from The Front
Posted March 17, 2004
Regular readers of this site will know that it’s been months since our
Fearless Leader deigned to hold one of the (once-upon-a-time monthly) Agency Meetings
that are intended as the primary forum for disseminating library
updates, project information, goals, new procedures and personnel news
to library managers. Running these meetings had been the responsibility
of the library’s infamous deputy director, Carolyn Garnes, but with
her disappearance from the scene, the task fell to Ms. Hooker. And as
with every other opportunity for leadership, Hooker has done her best
to either avoid it or delegate it, till it became a running joke among
staff.
Well, reader, we’re happy to report that there was a March Agency
Meeting. Our intrepid reporters have now filed their dispatches, so we
can offer you the following account of Ms. Hooker’s performance there.
The audience was primed for signs of the new-edition Mary Kaye
Hooker-the kinder, gentler, more sensitive one. But as Dorothy Parker
once said, on being told that Calvin Coolidge was dead - “How could
they tell?” Spotting signs of sensitivity in Ms. Hooker will apparently
require microscopes and carbon-dating techniques, so minuscule is the
evidence we have to work with. (See elsewhere
on the site for more suggestions along this line.)
As to the substance of Ms. Hooker’s performance: ah, no changes there!
Let’s recap her report to the troops. Keep in mind that she was addressing
the troops for the first time in four months.
Hooker started out on a high note: “Is there anybody here new who we
need to introduce?” One could almost feel the puzzlement spreading
through the audience. Have we not been in a hiring freeze for 6 months
or more? Is it not Ms. Hooker who brings personnel actions to the Board
every month? If someone new joined the organization - during a hiring
freeze, yet - wouldn’t she be the first to know? Is she entertaining
the possibility that people are parachuting into slots in branches,
unbeknownst to her?
Perhaps sensing the monolithic “Huh?” coming off the audience in waves,
Hooker sensibly moved on to her next point: the “big accomplishments”
of recent times. Everyone moved to the edge of their seats, not wanting
to miss hearing the description of any of these unusual creatures. And
they were not disappointed:
- “The Instructional Learning Unit is growing out in the branches.”
This announcement was baffling not only for its horticultural
implications but also because the ILU remains limited to the 4th floor
of the Central Library, so we don’t know what kudzu-like growth our
director is envisioning. Also according to Hooker, the ILU is getting
“national recognition” for its GED testing program. Not only have we
heard this line before, we are still reeling at the idea that it’s
possible to get “national recognition” for something that hasn’t
started yet. In Ms. Hooker’s world, directors probably get Oscars for
movies that have yet to see a camera roll.
- Partnerships, we’ve got partnerships, get your partnership right
here! The audience nobly resisted the urge to recite this part in
tandem with the director, which would be easy to do, since she’s been
singing these lyrics for one year now: we are partnering with Grady,
Emory and the CDC on a health literacy program because this is a
national need! She has proclaimed this to the board and at Agency
Meetings for a year, and we have yet to see one result of this
“partnership.”
But we did learn something new. She mentioned a
contribution she had made to this partnership: having noticed
the CDC had produced a 17-page pamphlet on prostate cancer, she
had pointed out to them that no one wanted to read a 17-page pamphlet
on prostate cancer. We say they might if they had prostate cancer,
Mrs. Hooker! Not to mention, if she thinks people don’t want to
read a 17-page pamphlet, then she probably thinks they aren’t going to
read a whole book on the subject, which pretty much removes any reason
for a library to participate in this project!
Moving right along, Ms. Hooker then brought up the AmeriCorps project,
a partnership which she also has been touting as an achievement for
one year (and the funding for which, it was acknowledged, is eating up
the equivalent of a part-time library assistant's salary).
Question to Ms. Hooker: What is the statute of limitations on
achievements? If President Hooker (God forbid) were giving the State
of the Union address to the nation in 2005, she’d probably start by
claiming the War of Independence, the Louisiana Purchase, the
Emancipation Proclamation, the Spanish-American War and the invention
of the cotton gin as achievements of her administration.
- "We’ve got our first human resources department” and
“We’ve got our first security department.” Again, we say, “Huh?” If
we only just got our first human resources and security departments,
then what are those offices on the first floor of Central, which have
been labeled “Personnel” and “Security” for years--possibly decades?
People went in and out of those offices, and claimed to work in them.
Were they part of a giant scam? Did Ms. Hooker uncover the fact that
up till now these offices were actually peopled by large cardboard
cut-outs?
- The new East Atlanta Branch Library, at least 4 years in
the making, is delayed again. Let us recap for you the total
explanation given staff by the director: “There was an ‘oops’ in the
bid.” Come to think of it, that’s probably how the head of Coca-Cola
discusses major industry developments with staff - “We had an ‘Oops!’
with New Coke, guys!” We can’t wait to explain to patrons that all we
know about the East Atlanta branch is that it’s in The Oops Phase.
- We’ve outsourced all our printing to Fulton County. Of
course, it wasn’t mentioned that this means we now have to pay for
printing. But Ms. Hooker did mention what became of the two staff in
the printing unit. One "elected" to retire, and one was transferred to
a public service site--“so that’s been successful,” said she. We wonder how the two
affected staff would characterize it.
- But more outsourcing is to come. Hooker reported that the Board has voted
to outsource our courier service to Pitney-Bowes. Staff in that
department will have to find a slot elsewhere in the library or Fulton
County, or they may opt to go with Pitney-Bowes (for comparable salary
and benefits? what about losing their pension, etc.?). Somehow Ms.
Hooker’s cavalier attitude toward the workers of the world suggests
that while she may once have selected "Chairman Mao’s Little Red
Book" for a library she once worked in, she didn’t read it.
Our favorite remark made by Hooker at the March 3rd Agency Meeting:
"It doesn't work! Nothing works!" (Amen to that, Sister!
For once, Hooker moves her mouth and God's Own Truth falls out of it.)
|
- On another front, Ms. Hooker mentioned that we are “completely
re-doing” the 7th floor of the Central Library. (From this
perspective, we can now see that what Sherman actually did on his
March to the Sea, was to "completely re-do" Georgia.) We at last "have
productivity standards up there" (as in, paying a vendor to do what
staff once did?), and we’ll be "cleaning up the database."
- Our favorite part of this portion of Hooker's presentation?
“Catalogers” are going to lead an effort, "along with reference," to
make GALILEO more usable by cataloging it. It’s our favorite part,
not only for the absurdity that we’re going to catalog a product from
the State of Georgia while we outsource our own cataloging, but because
we love that s on the end of catalogers. We have
one, count her, one, cataloger in this library system,
Ms. Hooker, thanks to your slash-and-burn tactics in Technical Services.
If you have an army of cataloguers in mind for this project, you must
be planning on getting them the way Jason got the Argonauts.
Having listed her shopworn “accomplishments,” Ms. Hooker opened the floor
to questions and concerns of staff. The most interesting were the
complaints about our e-mail crisis (crisis defined here as meaning “it
doesn’t work”).
Ms. Hooker agreed that e-mail crashes are a problem for her too,
since they cause her to show up for county meetings only to find the
date had been changed and she didn’t know about it. The audience
briefly contemplated the fact that we have a director who has about 8
secretaries but is unable to get to scheduled meetings.
But, Ms. Hooker went on to say, this e-mail problem is indeed serious, as
witness the fact that "when you Google 'Fulton County,' the library’s
website is the first hit." The audience, puzzled but game, thought
perhaps they had not heard correctly, and tried to concentrate harder.
But, as the director obligingly reiterated this bizarre statement
several times - that the e-mail problems are very apparent because a
Google search turns up the library website first instead of Fulton
County’s - one could almost hear the sound of eyeballs rolling back
into people’s heads all over the auditorium.
There wasn’t a whole lot to say after that. The small, broken
group shuffled out of the auditorium, convinced they were living out
some bad karmic destiny from a previous life.
All the times we bitched about the lack of an Agency Meeting, and now
we are reminded: Be careful what you wish for.
Dept. of Useless Remedies
Employees Long to Know Details
of Hooker’s “Sensitivity Training”
Posted March 15, 2004
No employee who’s endured four years of Mary Kaye Hooker thinks for an instant that it will do
any good-much less compensate for the institutional havoc and the personal harm she has
caused to dozens of library workers-but Inquiring Minds would love to know the details of how
Hooker’s employer, the library’s board of trustees, plans to implement its inane response to
Hooker’s repeated violations of federal law and county policies.
Rather than dismissing Hooker for her illegal actions, the board, after dithering for months without
doing anything and then spending $112,000 to pay a consultant to tell it what to do, finally decreed
that Hooker must attend mandatory training to improve, of all things, her “sensitivity.”
Here’s what we’re wondering about that:
- Who’s going to do the training?
The last we looked, “sensitivity training” isn’t on the roster of training classes offered by the
county’s training outfit. Does this mean Hooker will be sent to someone else for the training?
- Will the training be done locally, or is Hooker’s case so severe that she’ll have to be sent out
of state? (Now there's a happy thought....)
- Will the board form a committee to choose the lucky trainer, or
will they send out an RFP for one, or will Hooker be allowed to choose
her own trainer?
- Can the board assure library employees that, whatever selection method is used, a qualified
trainer will be chosen-preferably someone certifiably skilled and experienced in dealing with
sociopathic character disorders, anger management, impulse control, compulsive lying, and selective amnesia?
- What will the training consist of?
- Will Hooker be trained alone, or will she be joining other insensitive executives for training?
- Will Hooker be given a “sensitivity manual” to study and refer to later on?
- Will Hooker be required to participate in role plays with the trainer and/or fellow trainees, or
will the trainer focus on delving into the tangled roots of Hooker’s insensitivity?
- What, exactly, is Hooker expected to become more sensitive about? To whom, exactly, is
she supposed to display more sensitivity toward?
- How much training will Hooker receive?
One session? Two? Ten? Will these be hour-long sessions, or intensive all-day affairs? How many
sessions will be considered sufficient to get the job done?
- When, exactly, will the training commence?
The consultant who recommended the training suggested it be completed within 180 days (6 months)
from December 31, 2003. This means (groan) sometime before July 1, 2004. Is this target date going to be
respected? Extended? Ignored? Has the training perhaps already been scheduled?
- How will the board monitor Hooker’s attendance at her training sessions?
Given Hooker’s record for snookering the board about what does and doesn’t go on inside the
library system, will the board naively rely on Hooker’s mere report that she has actually attended
however many sessions she’s scheduled by her trainer to attend? Will there be a sign-in sheet
that a board member might inspect? Will Hooker receive a certificate at the end of her training?
- How much will Hooker's “sensitivity training” cost the county’s taxpayers?
Considering that the cost of the training will be on top of what Hooker’s already cost taxpayers for
her little “insensitive” (and illegal) indulgences, has the board determined that “sensitivity training”
is as cost-effective as alternative treatments (e.g., psychotropic medications, taking the waters, or
a nice, long leave of absence)? And, incidentally, from what budget will the training fee, whatever it
is, be deducted? Will this fee be reported or buried via some creative accounting maneuver?
- How will we know that the training has worked?
Compared with something empirical-like, say, the number of dollars wasted in needless lawsuits
or the number of employees who’ve quit the library system because they couldn’t bear to work with
Hooker any longer--the effectiveness of any sort of training that’s unrelated to demonstrable
technical skills is going to be exceedingly difficult to measure.
- Which Wise One(s) on the library board will pronounce Hooker’s training a success or a failure?
- Will Hooker be taking some sort of post-training “sensitivity quiz,” with the trainer reporting her
score to the board?
- Who will determine if the expected change in Hooker’s personality is genuine and permanent, or merely
a fleeting, opportunistic sham?
Even if the board becomes more pleased with Hooker’s interactions with trustees, what
happens if library employees can’t tell the difference between the pre-trained Hooker and
the trained one?
- Will employees’ observations and evaluations be considered relevant?
- If so, how does the board plan on taking those observations into account? Will there be a post-training
all-staff survey of staff opinions about Hooker’s improvement or lack of it? (If so, who will count the
ballots and report the results?)
We raise all of these questions to point out how completely absurd the board’s “solution” is to the
problem--that Hooker's mandated "sensitivity training" will be a complete waste of Hooker’s (not to mention the trainer’s)
time, and-assuming Hooker won’t be forced to pay for the training out of her pocket---a further
waste of taxpayer dollars.
If the board would communicate to library employees a few reassuring clarifications about what they
expect in this matter of a remedy for Hooker’s personality defects, perhaps we could all then
examine the more relevant subjects of when and under what circumstances Hooker will complete
the training-excuse us, re-training--in basic management principles and Equal Employment
Opportunity regulations that the board is also also requiring Hooker to complete before July 1, 2004.
In any case, if the board is serious about Hooker obtaining all the training and retraining the board
says Hooker needs, it’s clear that Hooker won’t be around the library too much over the coming
months.
If the board is serious.
Not that employees would terribly mind a really, really extended break from Mary Kaye Hooker before
being confronted with the “kinder, gentler” version the board apparently expects Hooker to morph
into.
EXTRA!! EXTRA!!
Library Sets New Standard for Customer Service!
AFPL Will Be Only Library in Western World
Open Christmas and New Year’s Day!
Posted March 11, 2004; updated March 26, 2004
Just when you think the Atlanta-Fulton Public Library can’t do anything
to make itself more ridiculous in the eyes of its community, the
library’s Board of Trustees rises to the challenge.
It was recently brought to the attention of the library board that
Christmas 2004 and New Year’s 2005 fall on Saturdays. Now, since Fulton
County sets its holidays for the convenience of Fulton County office
staff - who don’t work weekends like library staff do - the county’s
official holidays this year are Thursday, December 23, Friday, December 24, and
Friday, December 31. That leaves the library scheduled to be open on
Saturday, December 25 (Christmas, for those of you who don’t keep up)
and Saturday, January 1 (New Year’s Day).
The board's Personnel Committee recommended to the full board at its
January 28th meeting that it close the library on those days, and on
Easter Sunday, April 11.
In a sane institution, that recommendation would have sailed through,
but not in the wacky world of AFPL!
For our readers with the stomach to plow through the full discussion,
here's the full transcription of the board's recent
examination of the holidays question.
For the less machoistic, here's a re-cap of what happened:
First, board members struggled with the concept of the 40 hour week
(“Well, would staff lose pay?”) and then they wrestled with the
difference between a day the library is closed, and a holiday
(“Wouldn’t that mean staff would be getting an extra holiday?”). Hint
to board members: when Fulton County offices, or Fulton County schools,
or your own office, are not open for business on Saturday and Sunday,
it’s not a holiday, nor are your hours for the week reduced. You are
simply working your hours Monday to Friday, as opposed to Monday
through Sunday, which is what library staff do.
Board member (and Fulton County commissioner) Emma Darnell seemed to
have a particular struggle with that concept, even after she was
assured that Fulton County practice allows a department to set its own
schedule of opening. She was outraged by her conviction (unassailable
by logic) that the library would get an extra holiday if it closed on
Christmas Day or New Year’s! No one was up to the challenge of once
more explaining that there would be no additional holiday, but rather,
that staff scheduled to work those Saturdays would instead be working
another day that week. Note to Ms. Darnell: yes, Fulton County police,
firefighters, and Grady staff will be working Christmas and New Year’s,
but most people with a measurable IQ would agree that fire, crime and
medical emergencies fall into a different category of need than access
to bestsellers and the Internet. Certainly your own office - crucial
though it undoubtedly is to the smooth functioning of the county - will
be closed on Christmas, New Year’s--and on Easter too, come to think of
it.
Easter was a particularly sticky wicket for Darnell. She proclaimed
that the county cannot recognize a religious holiday (of course not,
that would be religious discrimination, which - unlike racial
discrimination at the library! - is banned). Someone bravely pointed
out that Fulton County does close on Christmas, which has an undoubted
connection to a religion. In the face of logic like that, the
recommendation to close the library was tabled for another time - i.e.
everyone hoped it would go away on its own. No one thought to point
out that the library was always closed on Easter Sunday up till 3
years ago, when Ms. Hooker unilaterally decided that that the library
would no longer be closed on that day. No one spoke up about the
employees who are angry at being scheduled to work on what they
believe to be the holiest day of the year. What was mentioned
was that staff report that there will be very little use of the library
if it should be open on these three days, but that argument held no
water for board member Becky Fern. Ms. Fern opined that that sounded
awfully like the argument her children make when they don’t want to go
to school (“No one else will be there!”). An analogy between the
recommendations of a professional staff and the behaviour of a board
member’s children’s...hmmm, thus are board decisions made at the
Atlanta-Fulton Public Library.
So that’s how the board left it last month. Decisions deferred,
recommendations ignored, ignorance of past practice elevated to a fine
art. So what if the staff has to work on Easter, against their
conscience?
March 26th Update: At its March 24th meeting,
the library board voted to close the library system on Easter Sunday,
April 11th. Hooker notified staff on March 26th. Unless the board takes
further action, the library is still scheduled to be open for business on
July 4th and December 25th.
Maybe by November 30, the board can figure out that having the library
open for business on Christmas and New Year’s will make them an even
bigger laughing stock. Or maybe not.
Look Who’s Turning Two!
Posted March 4, 2004
Every parent has experienced it with awe and sadness: the swift
passage of time, from the early days of sleepless nights and
relentless feedings, through the appearance of the first baby tooth,
and then those first Godzilla-like lurching movements across the floor.
Ah, how quickly those baby steps give way to toddler tantrums, and
leave us wondering how the first two years could have slipped so
swiftly away!
Yes, our baby is growing up. It’s been two years now since the blessed
event. We know you remember it as well as we do: that day in spring
2002 when our formerly smooth-surfaced and svelte Central Library
plaza convulsed and burst open, and lo, A Hole Was Born. Like all
healthy infants, it grew rapidly. Pretty soon there was more Hole than
plaza! More chunks of sidewalk were pushed into the all-consuming maw
of the Hole, but its hunger could not be appeased. It wasn’t long
before it had to be put in its very own crib, complete with green
opaque bunting, through which visitors peered to make cooing sounds
and comment on its appetite and size. So large was the baby Hole by
then that the crib took up pretty much the entire sidewalk, creating a
hazard not only for pedestrians but also for drivers attempting to
pull out of the side street who find their vision totally blocked by
that very attractive green bunting. But what are these small drawbacks
compared to the privilege of hosting the birth of the Georgia version
of the San Andreas Fault!
So we hope you’ll take a minute over the next couple of weeks, as you
come and go at the Central Library, to peer into the abyss and express
your best wishes for a happy birthday to our toddler Hole, as it leaves
babyhood behind forever. Maybe you could drop in a birthday card...or
even a cupcake with a candle or two. Hell, maybe you could do us all a
favor and dump in a wheelbarrow of Spackle - it couldn’t hurt.
HAPPY BIRTHDAY TO THE AFPL CRATER!!!
"Mary Kaye Hooker and William McClure
Must Be Ousted from The Library"
Posted March 3, 2004
Read the article printed in the
March 2004 newsletter of the
Fulton County Taxpayers Association.
If Fulton County Can't Reform Its Library,
Maybe Our Legislators Can
Posted March 2, 2004
If you're reading this site, you're probably someone who cares about
public libraries, and specifically, the Atlanta-Fulton Public Library.
If you're a regular visitor to the site, you're familiar with the
misdeeds, mistakes and incompetence that have left the library in its
present state of near-chaos.
The words of a federal appeals court, pressure from Fulton County,
editorials in the local paper, employee activism--none of it has been
enough to bring down the house of cards that is the Library Board of
Trustees.
Now it's up to the state legislature. Senate Bill 231 would mandate
reform of the library board. That bill passed the Senate last spring,
but languishes in the House.
Contact your state representative (and urge friends and neighbors
to do the same) and ask them to pass this legislation. Tell them how
important a state's major urban library system is--not only to local
library users and local schools, but also to the state as a whole. How
can Georgia hope to improve its educational ranking, when every day
the public library system of the state capital slides further into
disrepair?
The list below of local legislators is pulled from the March 2004
newsletter of the Fulton County Taxpayers Association. The
Association is urging its members to support
SB231. Join your voice with the voices of taxpayers and library patrons
across the Atlanta metropolitan area to ask the legislature--now in the
final two weeks of the 2004 session--to save the Atlanta-Fulton Public
Library.
| Rep. Kathy Ashe, District 42, Post 2 |
kashe42-2@mindspring.com |
| Rep. Tyrone Brooks, District 47 |
tbrooks@legis.state.ga.us |
| Rep. Roger Bruce, District 45 |
rbruce5347@aol.com |
| Rep. Mark Burkhalter, District 36 |
mburkhal@legis.state.ga.us |
| Rep. Tom Campbell, Jr., District 39 |
tcampbel@legis.state.ga.us |
| Rep. Brooks Coleman, District 65 |
bcoleman@legis.state.ga.us |
| Rep. Douglas Dean, District 49 |
ddean@legis.state.ga.us |
| Rep. Virgil Fludd, District 48, Post 4 |
vfludd@legis.state.ga.us |
| Rep. Pat Gardner, District 42, Post 3 |
pat@patgardner.org |
| Rep. Joe Heckstall, District 48, Post 3 |
powerheck@aol.com |
| Rep. Bob Holmes, District 48, Post 1 |
bholmes@cau.edu |
| Rep. Jan Jones, District 38 |
janjones38@bellsouth.net |
| Rep. Chuck Martin, District 37 |
chuck@martinforgeorgia.com |
| Rep. Nick Moraitakis, District 42, Post 4 |
nmoraita@legis.state.ga.us |
| Rep. John Noel, District 44 |
jnoel@legis.state.ga.us |
| Rep. Nan Grogan Orrock, District 51 |
norrock@legis.state.ga.us |
| Rep. Georganna Sinkfield, District 50 |
gsinkfie@legis.state.ga.us |
| Rep. LaNett Stanley-Turner, District 43, Post 2 |
lstanley@legis.state.ga.us |
| Rep. Sharon Beasley-Teague, District 48, Post 2 |
steague@legis.state.ga.us |
| Rep. Doug Teper, District 42, Post 1 |
repteper@mindspring.com |
| Rep. "Able" Mable Thomas, District 43, Post 1 |
mthomas@legis.state.ga.us |
| Rep. Joe Wilkinson, District 41 |
joe@joewilkinson.org |
| Rep. Wendell Willard, District 40 |
wkwillard@hotmail.com |
|